Why As an Immigration Law Firm We’re Hesitant on the Immigration Reform Proposals

As a migration law office, we support extensive migration reform. The present migration reform propositions under conversation do not resolve some of the essential problems that require to be dealt with in order to really reform migration in the United States. The legal propositions being talked about are heavy on ideology and light on truths, skirting essential elements of the system, such as the appeals court, that has to be modification. They do not resolve the underlying concerns with the system, and appear to be trying to spot it up rather of executing a complete overhaul.

Why Our Immigration Law Firm Is Hesitant About This Immigration Reform

Variety of Government Agencies Involved


We state that ‘too lots of cooks ruin the broth,’ and this may be a proper stating for the existing migration system. There are just a lot of federal governments firms included with migration, which makes for an extremely complex and complicated system.Simply under the mantle of the United States Department of Homeland Security, there are 3 firms with various instructions: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS); Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Contribute to that the U. S. Department of State (accused of managing the United States embassies and consulates), the United States Department of Justice (governs the Executive Office of Immigration Review), and the United States Department of Labor (which makes sure United States migration laws do not jeopardize reasonable labor requirements). While inescapable, a multi-agency venture causes our 2nd issue that does not appear to be attended to by existing legislation- the absence of responsibility.

Absence of Accountability

As a migration law office, we deal with all the United States Government companies included and we see an absence of responsibility as being a significant issue in the system. A prime example is the United States Embassy, whose consular officers’ choices are exempt to appeal or judicial evaluation. Another example is that an appeal from a migration judge’s choice can actually take years. Considering that there are many companies included it’s simple to point fingers when something fails and tough to take duty for fractures in the system.

Problems Related to Processing and Information Sharing

Simply put, the manner where cases stream through the migration system need to be repaired. There has to be consistency in adjudications and predictability in adjudicatory choices at every level. Interminable hold-ups must not be endured and appeals ought to not take years. The federal government companies included has to collaborate and share details.